I saw your response that the alternative would be that the other piece of the coin magically appear or fly to it creating its own set of problems, but I think that doesn't need to be the case. You'd have a post-scarcity society based around a cantrip. The same could be done RAW with meat, bread dang near anything. In general I dislike magic that creates matter ex-nihilo, it goes against the internal rules of my own setting and it carries with it a great deal of abusable mechanics and illogical notions.įor example as someone else already brought up, could this not be abused by say taking a gold coin snapping it in half and mending the larger side while keeping the chipped coin, repeating the process ad infinitum. It's a good write up and if you are comfortable with the ruling you've written than more power to you. The only difference in breakage types for use humans is the visual scale of the damage - in actuality, all damage is either physical (sledgehammer to sandpaper) or corrosive (from losing razor's edge to being dipped in acid).Īnd thus, I feel the technicalities of this spell are bad calls. The edge of the sword being sharpened, for example, would have all sorts of minor corrosion and pitting.
#HOW TO USE MY LITTLE BLACKSMITH SHOP WITH WINESKIN CRACKED#
Every other material, once cracked or pitted, will begin to oxidize - ergo, corrode. Mending should still hit them both.Īdditionally, if Meaning could not restore corrosion - well that would mean that mending can only fix gold. Now the damage from the micro-axe and sandpaper is the same. You also say a hits from an axe can be repaired.
"Sorry can't repair dust" you say - but, when the sword is slowly ground away from repeated combat, you say it can be repaired. I have issue with claiming it can't repair corrosion, dissolution, or being turned to dust.Įxample: you have a key, and it has the usable part worn away by sandpaper.
0 kommentar(er)
